McBride v. KIECKHEFER ASSOCIATES, INC.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 In this appeal we address the different roles of a trial judge when ruling on motions for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) compared to motions for new trial. We also address the different standards of appellate review applied to such rulings.
¶ 2 Appellants Gerald L. McBride and Billie T. McBride filed an action for damages against Appellees Kieckhefer Associates, Inc., Eugene P. Polk, Barbara J. Polk, John I. Kieckhefer, and Lynda B. Kieckhefer. 1 KAI asserted a statute of limitations defense. McBride alleged the existence of an oral tolling agreement and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Trustmark Insurance v. Bank One, Arizona, NACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dupray v. Jai DiningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Glazer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Jackson White v. Dos LandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.