Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow Drive

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1999No. 1971105Published

1Dissent

Although this case is not a model to be followed in filing a forfeiture action, I believe the provisions of Alabama law and this Court's rules of procedure permit this forfeiture action to proceed. I believe that the issue presented in this case requires that we construe our statutes governing forfeitures in parimateria with the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure.

Section 20-2-93, Ala. Code 1975, contains a list of all of the items of real and personal property "are subject to forfeiture" in Alabama. That Code section states, in pertinent part:

"(a) The following are subject to forfeiture:
". . . .

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reach v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. English v. State Ex Rel. PurvisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Durham v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API