Legal Opinion
In re Apple
New York City Family Court
Decided March 26, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIsidore Levine, J.
The question presented is, does, the Family Court have jurisdiction to order the State to contribute to the education of a handicapped child under section 4403 of the Education Law even if the child is pn public assistance.
The Commissioner of Education argues that the motion is premature and the Family Court may not impose liability for the cost of an order upon the State. A literal reading under section 232 (subd. [a], par. [1]) of the Family Court Act would support the Commissioner’s argument because it says: n a suitable order may be made for the education of such child in its home, a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- City of New York v. New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- The People v. . the Home Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Ferraiolo v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Matter of Kolb v. HollingNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re JessupNew York Family Court · 1975
- In re McDonaldNew York City Family Court · 1974
- In re FullerNew York City Family Court · 1976
- In re Suzanne E.New York Family Court · 1976