Legal Opinion

Arrison v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1833PublishedCited by 11 opinions

THE facts of this case were stated and considered in the nature of a special verdict, all of which are fully recited in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Kennedy, J.

This case has been brought before us by a writ of error to the judges of the court of common pleas of Northampton county: where The Commonwealth for the use of Rebecca Rhea was plaintiff; and Thomas M’Cracken and JDilman Kulb, the plaintiffs in error, with John Fulmer and John Hartzell, were defendants. The three latter were warned, as terre tenants of some of the lands upon which it was claimed, that the judgment upon which the scire facias was sued out was a lien. The material facts, as set forth in a case stated by the parties in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1815

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dougherty's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  2. Dietrich's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Miller Brothers v. Boyotz Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Duffey v. HoutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Parmentier v. GillespieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API