Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. Sullivan

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 13, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-1407(WGB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BASSLER, District Judge:

The plaintiff, Fannie Chalmers, through Omega Parraway, her sister, representative payee and guardian ad litem, brings this action pursuant to sections 205(g) and 1631(c)(3) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services [“Secretary”] terminating plaintiffs Supplemental Security Income [“SSI”] benefits, and requests their retroactive reinstatement. For the following reasons, the Court affirms the Secretary’s final decision terminating…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. David Rutherford v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Johnson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Townley v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chalmers v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Chalmers v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Chalmers (Fannie), Parraway (Omega), Guardian Ad Litem for Chalmers (Fannie) v. Shalala (Donna)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API