Legal Opinion
Papenhausen v. ConocoPhillips Company
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided March 26, 2024No. 1:20-cv-00115Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA David Papenhausen, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT vs. ) ) ConocoPhillips Company, and ) Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company ) Case No. 1:20-cv-115 LP, individually, and d/b/a Burlington ) Resources Oil & Gas LP, ) ) Defendants. ) Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment and a request for a hearing filed by Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 15 and 17). For the reasons that follow, the motion (Doc. No. 15) is denied and the request for a hearing (Doc. No. 17) is deemed moot. I. BACKGROUND This…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Kathy Davison v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota Rocco Forte, in His Individual and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Diesel MacHinery, Inc. v. B.R. Lee Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.