Legal Opinion

State v. Hess

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The state assigns as error the trial court’s ruling sustaining the plea in abatement and ordering the defendant discharged on the counts referred to in the foregoing statement. Sec. 353.06, Stats., provides:

“Every person who shall counsel, hire or otherwise procure any offense to be committed which shall be a felony may be indicted or informed against and convicted as an accessory before the fact either with the principal felon or after the conviction of the principal felon, or he may be indicted or informed against and convicted of a substantive felony, whether the principal felon shall or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Krueger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  4. People v. MarcusMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Karakutza v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. In Matter of Complaint Against SeraphimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. DehartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. MasseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API