Legal Opinion

Scott v. Blanton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 1, 1959No. 43817PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

The plaintiffs in this boundary action are appealing from a judgment sustaining a plea of prescription.

The appellants in their brief admit that the only testimony as to the value of the property in dispute was a statement of the defendant-appellee that he would not take $4,000 an acre for the property and that he did not know what it was worth. He stated that some property was sold for $3,500 an acre across the road.

We have examined the record and find that there is no expert testimony in the record regarding the value of the property and that the only testimony regarding its *664v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. NoraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Hunter v. HusseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. BlantonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API