Corridan v. Agranoff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentLoring, Justice
I am convinced that reasonable minds must conclude that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. When his car stalled and skidded it stood in a diagonal position across the east lane of the slippery 18-foot pavement and extended three to four feet onto the west lane. This left only nine feet of pavement and cleared shoulder for a car to pass on the west. The pavement was so slippery that when King sought to stop his car it went into a whirling skid and turned end for end facing south toward defendant’s approaching car, which had been following the King car. The King car stood partly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Sathrum v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Anderson v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Viken v. DicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927