Legal Opinion · Dissent

Corridan v. Agranoff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1941No. 32,735Published

1DissentLoring, Justice

I am convinced that reasonable minds must conclude that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. When his car stalled and skidded it stood in a diagonal position across the east lane of the slippery 18-foot pavement and extended three to four feet onto the west lane. This left only nine feet of pavement and cleared shoulder for a car to pass on the west. The pavement was so slippery that when King sought to stop his car it went into a whirling skid and turned end for end facing south toward defendant’s approaching car, which had been following the King car. The King car stood partly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Sathrum v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Anderson v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Viken v. DicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API