Iowa City State Bank v. Hoefer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Hon. W. A. Hocman, special Judge, Columbia, The facts are stated in the opinion. cites: As to allowance of interest: 97 S. C. 189; 19 S. C. 445. cites: As to allowance of interest: 61 S. C. 393; 64 S. C. 277; 66 S. C. 379. Distinguishes: 97 S. C. 189; 19 S. C. 445. The complaint could be considered amended: 61 S. C. 329; 61 S. C. 548; 68 S. C. 250; 68 S. C. 403; 68 S. C. 554; 24 S. C. 596. Prayer immaterial: 24 S. C. 43; 27 S. C. 225; 13 S. C. 439; Pomeroy Rem. 580;…
Read the full summary
Before Hon. W. A. Hocman, special Judge, Columbia, The facts are stated in the opinion. cites: As to allowance of interest: 97 S. C. 189; 19 S. C. 445. cites: As to allowance of interest: 61 S. C. 393; 64 S. C. 277; 66 S. C. 379. Distinguishes: 97 S. C. 189; 19 S. C. 445. The complaint could be considered amended: 61 S. C. 329; 61 S. C. 548; 68 S. C. 250; 68 S. C. 403; 68 S. C. 554; 24 S. C. 596. Prayer immaterial: 24 S. C. 43; 27 S. C. 225; 13 S. C. 439; Pomeroy Rem. 580; 27 S. C. 225; 13 S. C. 439. As to authority of agent to settle claim by taking back the goods: 1 Bail. 308; 1 Hill 184; 3…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Hydrxck.
This was an action on four negotiable promissory notes, aggregating $199.70 given by-défendant to the Royal Company of Io'wa City, Iowa, and endorsed by the payee to the plaintiff for .value before maturity, and without notice of any infirmity in the notes. These facts being shown, the Court directed a verdict for plaintiff for the full amount of the notes with interest.
1 2 Error is assigned in admitting two of the notes in evidence' without proof of the execution thereof by defendant. There is no merit in this contention, because…
2Cited by3 opinions
- City National Bank v. GivenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- Farr-Barnes Lumber Co. v. Town of St. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Farr-Barnes Lumber Co. v. Town of St. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924