Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Anpro, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 30, 1995PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants, Anpro, Ltd. and Marguerite Provenzano appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated September 24, 1993, as denied their cross motion for leave to amend their answers so as to assert certain counterclaims, and granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to dismiss their first, second, and fourth affirmative defenses.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
While leave to amend a pleading should be freely given (CPLR 3025 Pd]),…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mayers v. D'AgostinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Pellegrino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cohen v. HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Sidor v. ZuhoskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Branch v. Abraham & Strauss Department StoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Koeth v. KoethAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.