Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Williamson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1964No. 18783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge.

In this Arizona diversity action, appellant seeks a declaratory judgment upon the question of its liability under the “Omnibus Clause”1 of a policy of automobile insurance. At issue is the question whether the operator of an automobile involved in an accident was using the car with the permission of the named insured.

The court determined that no express permission had been granted and sent the case to the jury upon the issue of the existence or nonexistence of implied permission. Verdict was rendered against the appellant upon this issue.

Appellant had moved for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Delta Fire & Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Jurd v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Baesler v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Costanzo v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API