State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Williamson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge.
In this Arizona diversity action, appellant seeks a declaratory judgment upon the question of its liability under the “Omnibus Clause”1 of a policy of automobile insurance. At issue is the question whether the operator of an automobile involved in an accident was using the car with the permission of the named insured.
The court determined that no express permission had been granted and sent the case to the jury upon the issue of the existence or nonexistence of implied permission. Verdict was rendered against the appellant upon this issue.
Appellant had moved for a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brooks v. Delta Fire & Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Jurd v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Baesler v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Costanzo v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964