Legal Opinion
Auster v. Kinoian
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 26, 1977PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
153 N.J. Super. 52 (1977)
378 A.2d 1171
FRANCES AUSTER AND MURRAY AUSTER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HELEN KINOIAN, WALTER POWELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS GOLDEN EAGLE ANTIQUES AND POWELL LINDEN CORP., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 12, 1977.
Decided September 26, 1977.
Before Judges CONFORD, MICHELS and PRESSLER.
Mr. William J. Wolf argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Bathgate & Wegener, attorneys; Mr. Peter H. Wegener on the brief).
Mr. Antranig Aslanian, Jr. argued the cause for respondent Helen Kinoian (Messrs.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bilotti v. Accurate Forming Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Yanhko v. FaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Davis v. PecorinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
3Cited by23 opinions
- Augustine W. Badiali v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Group (071931)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Trinity Church v. Lawson-BellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- J. JOSEPHSON v. Crum & ForsterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Village Supermarket v. MayfairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Kaczorowska v. National Envelope Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.