Legal Opinion

In re Channing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 8, 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to. practice by this Court in 1995. She maintains an office for the practice of law in the Town of Catskill, Greene County.

Petitioner moves to confirm a Referee’s report issued after a hearing which sustained four of five charges of professional misconduct against respondent. Respondent cross-moves to reject the report to the extent the charges were sustained.

We grant petitioner’s motion and accordingly find respondent guilty of the following professional misconduct. As set forth in the petition, respondent entered into a real estate listing agreement, as a broker,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of EbrahimzadehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. In re ChanningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In re Van SiclenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. In re Van SiclenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. In re YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API