Legal Opinion

Espenship v. Carter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 1987No. BO-100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

This appeal is from a final judgment that determined John Michael Carter, Jr., possesses the exclusive hunting rights in a parcel of real property, that denied an injunction sought by his sisters to prevent him from stocking the property with nonnative game for commercial hunting purposes, that required him to render to his sisters an accounting of the profits gained from the hunting business, and that allowed the sisters to hunt on the land. We reverse the judgment to the extent it vests exclusive hunting privileges in Carter, an issue raised on appeal by Carter’s sisters, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Iglehart v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Armour Company v. LambdinSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Davis, Et Ux. v. GeyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. In Re Estate of SuggsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Jacksonville Elec. v. Beemik BuildersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beal Bank, SSB v. Almand and AssociatesSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Brook v. Mitchell (In Re Mitchell)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
  3. Roberts-Dude v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API