Legal Opinion

Freidus v. Hartwell

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 28, 2011No. 10-P-210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

The central issue presented by the former wife on this appeal from a judgment on cross-complaints for contempt is whether she was entitled to contractual attorney’s fees and costs incurred by her in “enforcing” the parties’ separation agreement, which was incorporated in the judgment of divorce nisi but survived the judgment as an independent contract. As we conclude that the judge did not err by failing to award the wife contractual attorney’s fees (or statutory attorney’s fees pursuant to G. L. c. 208, § 38), we affirm the judgment.

*4971. Background. The parties, who were married in 1990,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Drapek v. DrapekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Krapf v. KrapfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Stansel v. StanselMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. WalshMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Colorio v. MarxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. K.A. v. T.R.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  2. Silva v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API