Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. County of Lake
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALLEN SHARP, District Judge.
The defendants, Judges James J. Richards and Joseph Meszar, contend that they have judicial immunity from suit, which encompasses any action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as brought by the plaintiffs in the instant action.
The principle of judicial immunity has been long a part of our common law and the rationale for the same was succinctly stated by the Supreme Court of the United States in the early case of Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1871), as follows:
“For it is a general principle of the highest importance to the proper…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Santiago v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Harriett L. McMillan v. Gerald SvetanoffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Shore v. HowardDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1976
- Clark v. CampbellDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1981
- Blackwell v. CookDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.