City of Fort Worth v. Tuckness
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I. Introduction
The only issue we address in this appeal is whether Appellant City of Fort Worth possessed standing to bring a motion to set aside the trial court’s order of expunction entered in favor of Appellee David Lee Tuckness. Fort Worth, Tuckness’s employer, was not listed in Tuckness’s ex-punction petition as a law enforcement entity having records or files subject to ex-punction, and accordingly, it received no notice of the expunction proceedings. See Tex.Code CRIM. Proc. Ann. art. 55.02, § 2(b)(8), (c) (Vernon Supp.2004-05). After the trial court entered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Deck, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
- Carson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- City of Arlington v. ScalfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Fredricks, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
- Ex Parte S.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- City of Port Isabel v. Pinnell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- In Re the Expunction of Ocegueda, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.