Legal Opinion

Lee v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 11, 1972No. 4551PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

Richard Lee sued G. B. Howard, III, for personal injuries sustained by Lee when he was accidentally shot by Howard while the two were duck hunting in Arkansas. Both parties are residents of Texas, but since the alleged tortious conduct occurred in Arkansas, the trial court applied the substantive law of that State. Under the Arkansas comparative negligence act a plaintiff is not entitled to recover if his negligence equals or exceeds the defendant’s negligence. Arkansas Statute 1947, § 27-1730.2; Wagnon v. Barker, 236 Ark. 55, 364 S.W.2d 314 (1963).

The jury found that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strauss v. LaMarkTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Jenkins v. HenniganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Texas & New Orleans Ry. Co. v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Sisti v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. General American Transportation Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
  3. Mata v. AlbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Nugent v. Utica Cutlery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Creole Production Services, Inc. v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API