Legal Opinion

Red Star Yeast & Products Co. v. Merchandising Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

Plaintiffs claimed an easement by prescription. The trial court found (finding 5) that the disputed area—

“. . . has been used by the plaintiffs herein, and each of them, and their predecessors in title, openly, notoriously, continuously, adversely and under a claim of right from and after the dates hereinafter specified for a parking area, for a service area, for loading and unloading, and for ingress and egress, all in 'connection with their respective parcels of real estate hereinbefore described, in common with each other and with the defendant herein. . . . Said use by the respective…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carmody v. MulrooneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Shepard v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Carlson v. CraigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Martin v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shellow v. HagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Grygiel v. Monches Fish & Game Club, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Merchandising Corp. v. Marine National Exchange BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Widell v. TollefsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  5. Claudia B. Bauer v. Wisconsin Energy CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API