Legal Opinion

Edgar Cordoba v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 13, 2013No. 08-74384, 10-73112PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

These cases, consolidated for purposes of disposition, both present the question of whether landownership may form the basis for membership in a particular social group for purposes of eligibility for asylum. Because the agency did not have the benefit of our recent en banc decision in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder when it adjudicated petitioners’ claims, we grant the petitions for review and remand for the BIA to reconsider its determinations.

I

The Attorney General may, in his discretion, grant asylum to applicants determined to be refugees within the meaning of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Wilfredo Reyes v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Catherine Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Oliverto Pirir-Boc v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Carlos Conde Quevedo v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Felix Flores Rios v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API