Edgar Cordoba v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
These cases, consolidated for purposes of disposition, both present the question of whether landownership may form the basis for membership in a particular social group for purposes of eligibility for asylum. Because the agency did not have the benefit of our recent en banc decision in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder when it adjudicated petitioners’ claims, we grant the petitions for review and remand for the BIA to reconsider its determinations.
I
The Attorney General may, in his discretion, grant asylum to applicants determined to be refugees within the meaning of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Wilfredo Reyes v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Catherine Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Oliverto Pirir-Boc v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Carlos Conde Quevedo v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Felix Flores Rios v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.