Legal Opinion
Paddleford v. Biscay
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1971No. Civ. 27604PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
Plaintiff, Dorothy Paddleford, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her complaint against defendant, Marcel Pierre Biscay. She contends that the trial court erred in concluding that as a matter of law defendant was not hable in his judicial capacity for the acts described.
The first amended complaint alleged that defendant Biscay, a judge of the municipal court, conspired to violate Penal Code sections 813, 814, 815, 815a and 840. The acts charged are that defendant Biscay had printed a form of warrant permitting service day or night for warrants involving traffic…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- R. W. Agnew v. Richard W. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Martha M. Dieu v. Ralph P. Norton, Wendell W. Wright, Robert F. Cotton, Marie M. Tellschow, Gerald Block and S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Soliz v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. DinneenAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1974