West v. United Railways Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is the personal injury action referred to in the mandamus proceeding entitled State of Oregon ex rel. United Railways Co. et al. v. W. A. Ekwall, this day decided by us. See ante, page 439. It was there held that the amended bill of exceptions, which contained no exception to the ruling of the circuit court denying defendants’ motion for a directed verdict, was regular. Since the defendant claims no other exception, the record presents no assignment of error predicated upon an exception. There is no contention that any of the plaintiff’s pleadings are defective. The rule generally…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Bailey v. Security Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Shaughnessy v. KimballOregon Supreme Court · 1923