Schumann v. C. R. Reichel Engineering Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McGOLDRICK, J. pro tem. *
This is an action by one Helene Schumann for damages allegedly suffered as the result of injuries which she sustained in a fall on premises owned, leased, operated and maintained by C. R. Reichel Engineering Company, C. R. Reichel and Madeline Loomis. Plaintiff alleged that defendants had negligently and carelessly constructed, installed, operated and maintained certain portions of said premises, and that the aforesaid injuries were the proximate result of this negligence. In the trial of the matter by jury, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Porter v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Burks v. BlackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Longway v. McCallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Lehmann v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Di Muro v. Masterson Trusafe Steel Scaffold Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Cappa v. Oscar C. Holmes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Cappa v. Oscar C. Holmes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Kaney v. CustanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Kaney v. MazzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022