Legal Opinion

Stenerson v. City of Kalispell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1981No. 80-320PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell

Plaintiffs Stenerson and Schmidt, contractors, brought this' action in District Court, Flathead County, seeking to recover $28,301.31 from the City of Kalispell. The district judge entered judgment for the contractors for the total cost overrun on a rough grading job on the Buffalo Hills Golf Course. The City appeals.

In March 1975, the City of Kalispell asked for bids for rough grading and related work on an addition to the Buffalo Hills Golf Course. Respondent contractors obtained copies of the plans and specifications for the proposed work, including a booklet entitled “Rough Grading…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marta v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Haggart Construction Company v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hash v. R. J. Sundling & Son, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Sandkay Construction Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Sornsin Construction Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark Bros. Contractors v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Clark Bros. Contractors v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API