Friedman v. Rosenberg
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.
Plaintiff moves to change the venue of this negligence action from Nassau to Kings County on the ground of convenience of witnesses and to promote the ends of justice.
Defendants cross-move to retain the action in Nassau, on the same grounds.
*102The cross motion was unnecessary and is denied. Defendants are really only opposing plaintiff’s motion.
Plaintiff’s motion is granted. The affidavits of both parties are improper on the ground of convenience of witnesses; they fail to contain the necessary details. (Kramer v. Harder Mfg. Corp., 218 App. Div. 745; Liebowitz v. Hudson Tr. Corp., 59 N. Y. S.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kramer v. Harder Manufacturing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926