Legal Opinion

Hanemann v. Eberle

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1924No. 9737PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

This is a* suit for damages for violation of a plumbing contract.

The plaintiff avers that he contracted to do certain plumbing work to defendant’s property for the price of $150; that he had almost completed the contract when he was ordered off the property by the defendant. He prays for judgment for $150.

The defense is that plaintiff was to use all new material and that “he brought on the job considerable used piping material and installed the same despite the protest of the defendant”; that when plaintiff refused to remove the old piping and to replace it by new, she discharged him; that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dugue v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Monarch & Kaiser v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  3. Hart v. Tremont Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. Villalobos v. MooneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
  5. Dufour v. JaninSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1835

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pittman v. BourgeoisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Mayer Godchaux Co. v. ReganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API