Legal Opinion

Wefco, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1986No. 16025PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Monsanto Company appeals from a judgment in favor of cross-claimant Wefco, Inc. Wefco, a seller of farm supplies, was awarded its costs and attorney fees in defending against a product liability suit filed by Paul and Katherine Borchard. The Borchards claimed damages from a defective product. Wefco filed the cross-claim because the product manufacturer, Monsanto, failed to accept Wefco’s tender of defense under the Idaho Product Liability Reform Act. In a case of first impression, Monsanto argues on appeal that the district court erred in awarding costs and attorney fees…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Peters v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Devine v. CluffIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Winkler v. Gilmore & Tatge Mfg. Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Fearless Farris Wholesale, Inc. v. HowellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borchard v. Wefco, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Meldco, Inc. v. Hollytex Carpet Mills, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Security Pacific Bank v. CurtisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API