Crawford Transport Company, Incorporated v. Chrysler Corporation and Commercial Carriers, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CECIL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves an alleged violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. (Sections 1 and 2, Title 15 U.S.C.) The ease was tried to the court without a jury. After the plaintiff had completed the presentation of its evidence, the trial judge sustained the defendants’ motion, made in accordance with Rule 41(b) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss the action. The trial judge gave an oral opinion, made findings of fact and conclusions of law in writing 235 F.Supp. 751, and entered judgment for the defendants.
There is no material dispute over the basic…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Carl Sandburg Village Condominium Association No. 1, Plaintiffs v. First Condominium Development Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- David A. Yentsch, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Texaco, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- The Venzie Corporation, and F. M. Venzie & Company, Inc. v. United States Mineral Products Company, Inc. And William Armstrong & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Jack Malamud v. Sinclair Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Sealy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.