Legal Opinion

Application of Carlyle M. Ashley and William H. Roberts

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 25, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to-3, 7 to 9, and 15 of appellants’ application. 1 All of the claims of the application were found to be unpatentable over the prior art.

The invention disclosed in the application relates to a room unit for use in an induction type air conditioning system installed in a multi-room building.. The conditioned air is supplied from a central station to each room unit at high velocity and at high pressure through small conduits. Each room unit contains a heat…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of George J. DeanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. Application of WalkerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of Homer E. Allen, Deceased, by Helen M. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Application of Homer E. Allen, Deceased, by Helen M. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API