Wasserburger v. Consolidated Management Corp.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
In this appeal we affirm in part and reverse in part, holding that the trial court (1) did not abuse its discretion in finding excusable neglect so as to allow a garnishee to file a late answer, and (2) inappropriately terminated an action without motion or notice.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In January, 1987, Wayne Wasserburger began leasing certain heavy equipment to Consolidated Management Corporation (CMC) for use in its sewage ash operation near Igloo, South Dakota. CMC failed to make the lease payments, which resulted in suit being filed against it by Wasserburger. In July,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Norwest Bank Black Hills, N.A. v. Rapid City Teachers Federal Credit Union (No. 4122)South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Gunvordahl v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Credit Management Service, Inc. v. WendbourneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Gilliland v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richards v. LenzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Estate of HoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Wasserburger v. Consolidated Management Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Herr v. Dakotah, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of Estate of SteffenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.