Legal Opinion
In re D. H.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 2, 2008No. S08A0011PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEARS, Chief Justice.
The appellant, thirteen-year-old D. H., appeals from the trial court’s judgment that she had committed the delinquent offense of disrupting a public school under OCGA§ 20-2-1181. On appeal, D. H. contends that OCGA § 20-2-Í181 is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
1. The evidence of record shows that D. H. became boisterous, irate, and “very loud” in a class and that the classroom activity had to stop until D. H. was removed. There was also evidence that, when D. H. was taken to the principal’s office, she continued to be loud,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Cameron v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wallin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- ROCKDALE COUNTY. v. U. S. ENTERPRISES, INC.; And Vice VersaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Raber v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.