Legal Opinion

Paxton & Gallagher v. Pellish

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1931No. 1687PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bltjme, Justice.

On January 24, 1928, Pellish Brothers, the defendants herein, bought of the plaintiff, Paxton & Gallagher Company, of Omaha, a bill of goods consisting of shotgun shells, intended to be sold by the defendants during the game season of 1928, lasting from September to December, both months inclusive. The goods were to be shipped during the summer shortly previous to the commencement of the game season. In the written order given for these goods, the plaintiff’s agent, who sold the goods to the defendants, wrote into the contract the clause in controversy in this case, namely,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford v. NortonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  2. McGarry v. Superior Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Beymer Bauman Lead Co. v. HaynesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  4. Wing v. Wadhams Oil & Grease Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CR-RSC Tower I, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. United Lumber Yards, Inc. v. Modesto Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API