Legal Opinion

Cozzort v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 9, 1963No. 39809PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Franicum, Judge.

1. “A former recovery, or the pendency of a former suit for the same cause of action, between the same parties, in the same or any other court that has jurisdiction, shall be a good cause of abatement; but if the first action is so defective that no recovery can possibly be had, the pendency of a former suit shall not abate the action.” Code § 3-607. Thus, where one with actual knowledge and notice of the facts, having two or more inconsistent remedies against a defendant chooses one of such alternative remedies by filing suit in pursuit thereof, such choice operates as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benton v. TurkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Hawthorne v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Land v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Puett v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Stewart v. GoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cunningham v. CozzortCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API