Wilson v. American Palace Car Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
■ On appeal from an order advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 557.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
The bill in this case was filed by several stockholders in the American Palace Car Company of Maine, on behalf of themselves and such other stockholders as should come in, to restrain the American Palace Car Company of New Jersey from disposing of the property and assets of the Maine eompan)', which, it alleged, had been transferred to the New Jersey company *731in August, 1897. By an. amendment 'of the bill, made in September, 1901, the Maine company was made a party defendant, and afterwards, by a supplemental bill, the American Palace Car…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
3Cited by16 opinions
- Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Swetland v. SwetlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Elgart v. MintzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Spoor-Thompson, C., Co. v. Bennett, C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.