Legal Opinion
Fiorita & Amoroso v. Cunard S. S. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 7, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
These two eases were tried together, and were brought to recover for damages to boxes of lemons shipped on the steamer Wilton at Messina and Palermo, and delivered at New York.
The bills of lading received by the shippers were on the forms of the Cunard Company, which shipped the lemons in Italy, delivered them at New York, and charged and collected the freight. The company referred to throughout the bills of lading is the Cunard Company. The shippers were never informed by that company that it was acting as an agent in the premises; indeed, the counsel for the company…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. MERCHANTS'BANK.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Transportation Company v. DownerSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Express Co. v. Kountze BrothersSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- The PersianaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Jl LuckenbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- The Thomas P. BealCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- California Victor Distributing Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- S. L. Jones & Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- United States v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.