Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Josephson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 13, 1994Published

1DissentGaribaldi, J.

Today, the majority holds that the Anti-Eviction Act, as amended by L.1986, c. 38, applies to all foreclosing mortgagees holding a lien that was established prior to the leasehold of the tenant in possession. In so doing, the majority does precisely what this Court declined to do in Guttenberg Savings & Loan Ass’n v. *?Rivera, 85 N.J. 617, 428 A.2d 1289 (1981)—namely, extend the Anti-Eviction Act to foreclosing mortgagees without a clear legislative indication that such a construction reflects the Legislature’s intent. Relying primarily on the ambiguous words, “the owner’s or landlord’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MaguireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Cedar Cove, Inc. v. StanzioneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Quaremba v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Elberon Bathing Co., Inc. v. Ambassador Insurance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. In Re Petition of Keogh-DwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API