Legal Opinion

Peha's University Food Shop v. Stimpson Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1934No. 24887. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard, J. —

On January 4, 1933, plaintiff, a domestic corporation, commenced an action against the Stimpson Corporation, a foreign corporation, for damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of breach of a certain conditional sales contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff also sought cancellation of a certain note, or recovery of the amount thereof.

At the time of the filing of the complaint, the plaintiff caused a writ of garnishment to issue and to be served upon certain parties in Bellingham and Seattle, alleging in the affidavit for issuance of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Peyton v. PeytonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hallock v. JaudinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Kuhn v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Burnham v. Spokane Mercantile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. City of Ballard v. WayWashington Supreme Court · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graham v. Yakima Stock Brokers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. ScheelWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Ellern v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API