Legal Opinion

Gamblin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1924No. 15810PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwobth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is alleged in the motion for a new trial and argued in the brief of counsel that the venue was not proved; and for this reason a new trial is urged. Under the laws of Georgia, receiving stolen goods, *52knowing them to have been stolen, is a distinct offense and punishable as such. In Pat v. State, 116 Ga. 93 (2) (42 S. E. 390), the Supreme Court said: “The gist of the offense of receiving stolen goods knowing them to have been stolen is the felonious knowledge that the goods were stolen; and to constitute the offense, the person receiving the goods must…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Moye v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Jacobs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Licette v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API