Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Menz School District No. 5

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdzell, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to recover for transportation furnished to a pupil attending school. There is no serious dispute regarding the. facts which, may be sufficiently stated by referring .to the findings of fact of the trial court. The cause was originally brought before a justice of the peace who found in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff appealed to the district court where, after trial, the following facts were found: That the child of the plaintiff was of compulsory school age and that the plaintiff was responsible for her attendance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Littell v. Bonney & StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Smith v. FieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. England v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bryan v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Reich v. DIETZ SCHOOL DIST. NO 16 OF GRANT COUNTYNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Estep v. DeGarmoShenandoah County Circuit Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API