Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Ex Rel. Baker v. Evans

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1996No. 1941959Published

1ConcurrenceMaddox, Justice

I concur with the per curiam opinion’s interpretation of the supernumerary statute, § 12-17-213(b), Ala.Code 1975. Based on *424my review of the statute, the ease law, and the appellants’ response to the questions propounded by this Court, I believe that this interpretation of the statute is the correct interpretation.

However, I write to point out that this supernumerary legislative scheme is extremely complex, made up of a patchwork of various statutes, seemingly without any organization or uniformity. Supernumerary status has for many years been a source of much legal debate and many legal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Norris v. HumberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API