Legal Opinion

Kempf v. Cummings

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1992No. 91-693PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YELVERTON, Judge.

This appeal raises the issue of whether an abstracter, as a member of the public, has the right to remove original unbound acts and land records from a parish clerk of court’s office for the purpose of evading photocopying fees. The court below issued a ruling that, in effect, recognized the existence of such a right. We reverse.

FACTS

Charles Cummings is the defendant in this action. He is an abstracter with an office in Opelousas. As an abstracter, Cummings spends a lot of time in the St. Landry Parish Clerk of Court’s office in Opelousas examining public records.

Patti Hebert…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Title Research Corp. v. RauschSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Traigle v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. Cummings v. KempfLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marler v. ReedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Allen v. RitterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API