Legal Opinion
Rostosky v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 5, 1976No. Appeal, No. 174 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson,
The question presented here is whether an appeal was properly quashed by the Environmental Hearing Board (Board). The appellant’s counsel admits that the period for appeals to the Board expired after he filed erroneously with the appellee Department of Environmental Besources (DEB). He claims, however, that he was misled by an outdated copy of procedural regulations sent him by the DEB. We hold the quashing proper.
On July 21, 1975, a hearing before the DEB found that the appellant had violated a condition of his surface mine permit. Notice of this decision was sent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Norristown Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Pittsburgh v. P. U. C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Herdelin v. GreenbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- In Re Annexation of a Portion of Township of FranklinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. RickCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Williamson v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Tarlo v. University of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Roderick v. Commonwealth, State Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- County of Lawrence v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.