Baltimore Baseball Club, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge
Plaintiff brought this suit to recover income taxes and assessed interest, plus interest as provided by law. We presently are called upon, by way of cross-motions for partial summary judgment, to rule on Count II of plaintiff’s petition. There is no genuine issue as to any material fact, which would prevent our granting partial summary judgment in this case. We hold for the defendant for reasons hereinafter stated, and therefore allow its cross-motion for partial summary judgment on Count II of the petition.
Plaintiff is a corporation which owns and operates a professional “major league”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Cappel House Furnishing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Prendergast v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
- 10-42 Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Frank H. Gilbert and Hazel P. Peterson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- George L. Castner Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John Howard Burbage, and Rosalind A. Burbage v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- George E. Eibel v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Sun First National Bank of Orlando v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- KauffmanUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.