Legal Opinion

Folinsbee v. Sawyer

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided May 3, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by Harrison D. Folinsbee against George P. Sawyer. From a judgment entered on a verdict dismissing the complaint, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

The plaintiff, by his action, seeks to recover commissions due him as a broker for effecting a contract of sale of real *699estate. The evidence relied upon to establish plaintiff’s employment is satisfactory, and clearly authorized the jury so to find. This is scarcely contended against. The real • question in the case is, did plaintiff fulfill the contract which he undertook? If so, he is entitled to remuneration. Whatever doubt existed as to what constitutes the engagement of a broker under such employment was set at rest by the decision in Sibbald v. Iron Co., 83 N. Y. 382, where it is stated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Gilder v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Condict v. . CowdreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Height v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alt v. DoscherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Alt v. DoscherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Travis v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Baldwin v. Jardine Matheson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  5. Fuller v. Bradley Contracting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API