United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rochester
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
We have carefully considered the forceful motion for a rehearing presented by the able counsel for appellant, and confess, as we did in our original opinion, that the vital question raised in various forms has seemed difficult of a correct determination; but, in the absence of adjudicated cases that are considered clearly in point, and that we feel should be approved, to point the way, we do-not see our way clear to grant the motion. Nor on the vital question do we feel that we-can, without prolixity, materially add to the views expressed in our original opinion. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fordtran v. StowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Debes v. GreenstoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London, Ltd. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Davis v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.