Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rochester

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1926No. 11340Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

We have carefully considered the forceful motion for a rehearing presented by the able counsel for appellant, and confess, as we did in our original opinion, that the vital question raised in various forms has seemed difficult of a correct determination; but, in the absence of adjudicated cases that are considered clearly in point, and that we feel should be approved, to point the way, we do-not see our way clear to grant the motion. Nor on the vital question do we feel that we-can, without prolixity, materially add to the views expressed in our original opinion. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fordtran v. StowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Debes v. GreenstoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London, Ltd. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Davis v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Texas Employers' Ins. v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API