Legal Opinion

Valentine's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1929No. Appeal, 229PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschziskeb,

Testatrix died possessed of an individual estate and also of an estate over which she had power of appointment under a certain deed of trust; the court below, though divided in opinion, held that her will did not evidence an intention to blend the appointive estate with her own to such an extent as to subject the former to the Pennsylvania inheritance tax; the Commonwealth has appealed.

The will in question first directs the payment of all debts; and, since to this point no mention is made of the appointive estate, the direction means that such debts are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCord's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Hagen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Forney's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Twitchell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jackson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. In Re Estate of BreaultIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Anderson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Provident Trust Co. of Phila. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Stannert's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API