Legal Opinion

Trice v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 31, 1974No. 48968PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. The requirement of Code Ann. § 81A-140 (c) (1): "The courts shall provide for the placing of actions upon the trial calendar without request of the parties but upon notice to the parties,” is complied with by mailing notice that the case will be on the trial calendar on a given date to the attorney for the litigant, no question being raised but that the notice was received in due course of mail. Tootle v. Player, 225 Ga. 431 (3) (169 SE2d 340).

2. (a) Where, according to the uncontroverted certificate of the clerk of the superior court of Lamar County the court calendar for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tootle v. PlayerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Kalin v. PfarnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Jordan v. PlottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tallman Pools of Georgia, Inc. v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Murer v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Miller v. GrierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Porter v. TissenbaumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Scott v. WS BADCOCK CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API