Legal Opinion

Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Philadelphia-Girard Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 24, 1929No. 4049PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Cireuit Judge.

The District Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ bill praying that the defendant bank pay to them, as trustees in bankruptcy of the maker of several promissory notes, the market value of the pledged collateral which the defendant bank, holder of the notes, had sold and, as they claimed, had unlawfully converted. The plaintiffs appealed.

The defendant bank, which we shall call the “city bank,” is a national banking institution organized as a result of a merger between several banks with its banking house in the City of Philadelphia, Prank C. MeCown, a stock and bond broker,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. McDonald v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Oleon v. Rosenbloom & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Standard Wood Products Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API