E. B. Latham & Co. v. Mayflower Industries
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
Prior to March 10, 1950, defendant Mayflower Industries (hereafter called “ Mayflower ”) was a distributor of home laundry products manufactured by defendant Thor Corporation (hereafter called “ Thor ”) pursuant to an oral agreement between Thor and Mayflower. The agreement provided that Mayflower was to be Thor’s distributor in certain counties in New Jersey; and that Mayflower with plaintiff E. B. Latham & Company, a domestic corporation (hereafter called “ Latham ”), was to be a codistributor of Thor products in the metropolitan New York territory.
Plaintiff claims that the Mayflower…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Colson v. PelgramNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Brownell v. Board of Education of Inside Tax District of City of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Roman v. Sunshine Ranchettes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Auerbach v. FrankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- George Hyman Construction Co. v. Precision Walls, Inc. of RaleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Hagaman Manufacturing Corp. v. Rough-Wear Clothing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.